The Law of Slavery
Virginia: 1619-1865
Origins, 1619-1662
Development, 1662-1705
Statutes and Court Cases
Codification, 1705-1776
Hening, ed. Statutes at Large
Revolutionary Revisions
Sources
- Hening, ed. Statutes at Large
- Shepherd, ed. Statutes at Large
- Supplement to the Revised Code (1819)
Modifications, 1806-1826 And Later
Sources, 1806-1826 And Later
- sources mentioned earlier
- Code of 1849
- Code of 1860
- Laws, etc... (Session laws: 1806-1807) Acts passed at a General
Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, begun and held at the Capitol,
in the city of Richmond . . .
Sources
- State Slavery Statutes: Guide to the Microfiche
Collection , editorial adviser, Paul Finkelman. 354 microfiche; ALDERMAN
Microfiche 2193
Getting Down To Cases
What is the purpose of each law?
Whom does each law affect?
What social impact did each law have?
Why did white Virginians (and other white lawmakers)
bother with a law of slavery?
Law Of 1662
-
Whereas some doubts have arisen whether children got
by any Englishman upon a negro woman should be slave
or Free, Be it therefore enacted and declared by this present grand
assembly, that all children borne in this country shalbe held bond
or free only according to the condition of the mother, And that
if any christian shall committ Fornication with a negro man or woman, hee
or shee soe offending shall pay double the Fines imposed by the former
act. (Hening, II, 170.)
Law Concerning Conversion, 1667
-
Whereas some doubts have arisen whether children that are
slaves by birth, and by the charity and piety of their owners made pertakers
of the blessed sacrament of baptisme, should by vertue of their baptisme
be made Free; It is enacted and declared by this grand assembly, and
the authority thereof, that the conferring of baptisme doth not alter
the condition of the person as to his bondage or Freedome; that diverse
masters, Freed from this doubt, may more carefully endeavour the propagation
of christianity by permitting children, though slaves, or those of greater
growth if capable to be admitted to that sacrament. (Hening, II, 260.)
Laws Of Control (1669)
-
Whereas the only law in force for the punishment of refractory
servants resisting their master, mistris or overseer cannot be inflicted
upon negroes, nor the obstinacy of many of them by other then violent measures
supprest, Be it enacted and declared by this grand assembly, if
any slave resist his master (or other by his masters order correcting him)
and by the extremity of the correction should chance
to die, that his death shall not be accompted ffelony, but the master (or
that other person appointed by the master to punish him) be acquit from
molestation, since it cannot be presumed that prepensed malice (which alone
makes murther ffelony) should induce any man to destroy his owne estate.
(Hening, II, 270).
More Control Laws
-
Insurrection laws
-
Oyer and terminer courts,
1692
Implications of
control laws
-
The "police laws" of which Stephen Douglas made so much in
1858
-
"Sheep do not make insurrections"
-
People without wills could be dangerous
-
"fair means or foul" could be used against them
-
Virginia’s courts and slaves
"Definition" laws
-
Racial slavery
-
Ethnocentric slavery
Property laws
-
real property?
-
inheritance
-
attachment for debt, etc.
-
personal property
Implications of property laws
-
slaves could be
-
moved
-
sold
-
willed (inherited)
-
given
Case study
-
Trial of Dick, Accomac County, 1775
-
Accused of "illegal administration of medicine"
-
Luther Martin must defend
-
Why bother?
-
How?
-
Did owner fail to control the slave?
-
Customary (plantation) law sufficient?
-
"Example" to slave community
-
Protection of society
-
Protection of property
-
Efficacy; deterrent power
-
Slaves’ attitudes towards the law
Another case study from
1775
-
James, the slave of James Gordon
-
sheep stealing
-
Post-Dunmore
-
benefit of clergy ritual
-
"GOD DAMN THE KING AND THE GOVERNOR
TOO!"
-
Audiences; American Revolution
The American Revolution
-
"Casual killing" law changed by 1788
-
Unanimous court for execution; "buying from under the gallows"
-
Manumission law of 1782
George Washington and slaves
-
Concerns of a hypothetical day
-
Runaway slaves
-
Purchase
-
rumors of insurrection
-
slave court justices
-
George’s and Martha’s wills
-
customary (plantation) law--Mount Vernon
-
increase in Washington’s slaves
-
court cases: chancery, breach of contract,
criminal
-
Dismal Swamp Company slaves
-
slave hiring
-
administration of John Parke Custis estate
-
Washington’s national stature and responsibilities
The nineteenth century
-
Slave law intertwined with the entrenched slave society Virginia
had become
-
Revolt and representation
-
Population
-
Politics
-
Industrialization
-
Jefferson
-
Gabriel, 1800
-
Nat Turner, 1831
-
Free African Americans
Reading
Education
Jefferson and his slaves
-
Slave Laws in Virginia, chapter 2
-
public and private roles
-
other examples
Jefferson’s testamentary emancipation
-
The laws of 1782, 1806 and 1816
1782 manumission law
-
Provided always . . . That all slaves so set free,
not being in the judgment of the court, of sound mind and body, or being
above the age of forty-five years, or being males under the age of twenty-one,
or females under the age of eighteen years, shall respectively be supported
and maintained by the person so liberating them, or by his or her estate.
. . . (Hening, The
Statutes at Large, XI, 39; passed and in effect, May 1782.)
1806 manumission law
-
"If any slave hereafter emancipated shall remain within this
commonwealth more than twelve months after his or her right to freedom
shall have accrued, he or she shall forfeit all such right, and may be
apprehended and sold by the overseers of the poor of any county or corporation
in which he or she shall be found, for the benefit of the poor of such
county or corporation." [Shepherd, Statutes at Large, III, 252;
passed January 25, 1806; in effect May 1, 1806.]
1816 manumission law
The manumission laws observed
-
"I humbly and earnestly request of the legislature of Virginia
a confirmation of the bequest of freedom to these servants, with permission
to remain in this state where their families and connections are as an
additional instance of the favor, of which I have received as many other
manifestations in the course of my life, and for which I now give them
my last solemn, and dutiful, thanks."
-
Legislative exception: Acts, 1827-28, 25.
After Jefferson
-
Nat Turner’s Revolt
-
The debates of 1831-2
-
Hardening of the law
-
Fear of sale; control by sale
-
Changing Virginia
-
The Richmond exception
Case Study, 1831
-
"An Act to amend the act concerning slaves, free negroes
and mulattoes," passed April 7, 1831; in effect June 1, 1831. Acts Passed
at a General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Begun and Held at
the Capitol, in the City of Richmond, 1830-31 (Richmond: Thomas Ritchie,
1831), 107-108.
-
Reading and writing laws
Thirteenth amendment, December 1865
-
Sect. 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except
as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,
shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.